An investigation of neutron direct damages at energies of 0.1-2 MeV on the DNA molecules with atomic structure deduced using Geant4 toolkit

Authors

10.22052/7.1.1

Abstract

This study proposes a method to estimate RBE of fast neutrons using Monte Carlo simulations. This approach is based on the combination of an atomic resolution DNA geometrical model and Monte Carlo simulations for tracking particles. Atomic positions were extracted from the Protein Data Bank. The GEANT4 code was used for tracking the secondary particles generated by fast neutrons during their interaction with liquid water. Since secondary particles spectra were used instead of simulating the interaction of neutrons explicitly, this method reduced the computation time dramatically. Double strand break induction was used as the endpoint for the estimation of fast neutrons relative biological effectiveness (RBE).60Co γ -rays were used as the reference radiation quality. The model succeeded in reproducing the behavior of the RBE and the position of RBEmax as a function of the incident neutron energy between 0.1 MeV to 2 MeV.

Keywords


[1] M. Bauchinger, L. Koester, E. Schmid, J. Dresp and S. Streng. Chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes induced by fission neutrons, International Journal of Radiation Biology and Related Studies in Physics, Chemistry and Medicine 45(5) (1984) 449–457. [2] R.S. Stone. Neutron therapy and specific ionization, AJR 59 (1948) 771–785. [3] M. Catterall. The treatment of advanced cancer by fast neutrons from the Medical Research Council's cyclotron at Hammersmith Hospital, London, European Journal of Cancer 10(6) (1974) 343–347. [4] K. Tanaka, N. Gajendiran, S. Endo, K. Komatsu, M. Hoshi and N. Kamada. Neutron energy-dependent initial DNA damage and chromosomal exchange, Journal of Radiation Research 40(SUPPL) (1999) S36–S44. [5] R.L. Dobson, T. Straume, A.V. Carrano, J.L. Minkler, L.L. Deaven, L.G. Littlefield and A.A. Awa. Biological Effectiveness of Neutrons from Hiroshima Bomb Replica: Results of a Collaborative Cytogenetic Study, Radiation Research 128(2) (1991) 143–149. [6] T. Straume, J.C. McDonald, R.A. Pederson, D.J. Brenner and R.L. Dobson. Hiroshima-Like Neutrons from A-Bomb Replica: Physical Basis for Their Use in Biological Experiments, Radiation Research 128(2) (1991) 133–142. [7] L. Gray and J. Read. Treatment of cancer by fast neutrons, Nature 152(3845) (1943) 53. [8] L.H. Gray, A.D. Conger, M. Ebert, S. Hornsey and O. Scott. The concentration of oxygen dissolved in tissues at the time of irradiation as a factor in radiotherapy, The British Journal of Radiology 26(312) (1953) 638–648. [9] R.C. Miller, S.A. Marino, S.G. Martln, K. Komatsu, C.R. Geard, D.J. Brenner and E.J. Hall. Neutron-energy-dependent cell survival and oncogenic transformation, Journal of Radiation Research 40(Suppl) (1999) S53–S59. [10] M. Spotheim-Maurizot, M. Charlier and R. Sabattier. DNA radiolysis by fast neutrons, International Rournal of Radiation Biology 57(2) (1990) 301–313. [11] E. Schmid, D. Regulla, S. Guldbakke, D. Schlegel and M. Roos. Relative biological effectiveness of 144 keV neutrons in producing dicentric chromosomes in human lymphocytes compared with 60Co gamma rays under head-to-head conditions, Radiation Research 157(4) (2002) 453–460. [12] S. Agostinelli, J. Allison, K.a. Amako, J. Apostolakis, H. Araujo, P. Arce, M. Asai, D. Axen, S. Banerjee and G. Barrand. GEANT4—a simulation toolkit, Nuclear instruments and methods in physics research section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 506(3) (2003) 250–303. [13] M. Bernal, M. Bordage, J. Brown, M. Davídková, E. Delage, Z. El Bitar, S. Enger, Z. Francis, S. Guatelli and V. Ivanchenko. Track structure modeling in liquid water: A review of the Geant4-DNA very low energy extension of the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit, Physica Medica 31(8) (2015) 861–874. [14] S. Incerti, A. Ivanchenko, M. Karamitros, A. Mantero, P. Moretto, H. Tran, B. Mascialino, C. Champion, V. Ivanchenko and M. Bernal. Comparison of GEANT4 very low energy cross section models with experimental data in water, Medical Physics 37(9) (2010) 4692–4708. [15] R.D. Stewart. Induction of DNA Damage by Light Ions Relative to 60Co γ-rays, International Journal of Particle Therapy 5(1) (2018) 25–39. [16] R.D. Stewart, S.W. Streitmatter, D.C. Argento, C. Kirkby, J.T. Goorley, G. Moffitt, T. Jevremovic and G.A. Sandison. Rapid MCNP simulation of DNA double strand break (DSB) relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for photons, neutrons, and light ions, Physics in Medicine & Biology 60(21) (2015) 8249. [17] F. Semsarha, B. Goliaei, G. Raisali, H. Khalafi and L. Mirzakhanian. An investigation on the radiation sensitivity of DNA conformations to 60Co gamma rays by using Geant4 toolkit, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 323 (2014) 75–81. [18] M. Bernal, C. deAlmeida, S. Incerti, C. Champion, V. Ivanchenko and Z. Francis. The influence of DNA configuration on the direct strand break yield, Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine 2015 (2015). [19] D. Charlton, H. Nikjoo and J. Humm. Calculation of initial yields of single-and double-strand breaks in cell nuclei from electrons, protons and alpha particles, International Journal of Radiation Biology (2009). [20] S. Incerti, I. Kyriakou, M.A. Bernal, M.C. Bordage, Z. Francis, S. Guatelli, V. Ivanchenko, M. Karamitros, N. Lampe, S.B. Lee, S. Meylan, C.H. Min, W.G. Shin, P. Nieminen, D. Sakata, N. Tang, C. Villagrasa, H.N. Tran and J.M.C. Brown. Geant4-DNA example applications for track structure simulations in liquid water: A report from the Geant4-DNA Project, Medical Physics 45(8) (2018) e722–e739. [21] W.-G. Shin, M.-C. Bordage, D. Emfietzoglou, I. Kyriakou, D. Sakata, C.H. Min, S.B. Lee, S. Guatelli and S. Incerti. Development of a new Geant4-DNA electron elastic scattering model for liquid-phase water using the ELSEPA code, Journal of Applied Physics 124(22) (2018) 224901. [22] Y. Hsiao and R. Stewart. Monte Carlo simulation of DNA damage induction by x-rays and selected radioisotopes, Physics in Medicine & Biology 53(1) (2007) 233. [23] H. Nikjoo, P. O'Neill, M. Terrissol and D. Goodhead. Quantitative modelling of DNA damage using Monte Carlo track structure method, Radiation and Environmental Biophysics 38(1) (1999) 31–38. [24] W. Friedland, P. Jacob, H.G. Paretzke, M. Merzagora and A. Ottolenghi. Simulation of DNA fragment distributions after irradiation with photons, Radiation and Environmental Biophysics 38(1) (1999) 39–47. [25] F. Semsarha, G. Raisali, B. Goliaei and H. Khalafi. Microdosimetry of DNA conformations: relation between direct effect of 60Co gamma rays and topology of DNA geometrical models in the calculation of A-, B-and Z-DNA radiation-induced damage yields, Radiation and Environmental Biophysics 55(2) (2016) 243–254. [26] M. Bernal, M.-C. Bordage, J. Brown, M. Davídková, E. Delage, Z. El Bitar, S. Enger, Z. Francis, S. Guatelli and V. Ivanchenko. Track structure modeling in liquid water: A review of the Geant4-DNA very low energy extension of the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit, Physica Medica 31(8) (2015) 861–874. [27] J.B. Marion and F.C. Young. Nuclear Reaction Analysis: Graphs and Tables, (1968). [28] H. Nikjoo, C.E. Bolton, R. Watanabe, M. Terrissol, P. O'Neill and D.T. Goodhead. Modelling of DNA damage induced by energetic electrons (100 eV to 100 keV), Radiation Protection Dosimetry 99(1-4) (2002) 77–80. [29] M. Tajik, A.S. Rozatian and F. Semsarha. Calculation of direct effects of 60Co gamma rays on the different DNA structural levels: A simulation study using the Geant4-DNA toolkit, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 346 (2015) 53–60. [30] M. Bernal and J. Liendo. An investigation on the capabilities of the PENELOPE MC code in nanodosimetry, Medical physics 36(2) (2009) 620–625. [31] G. Baiocco, S. Barbieri, G. Babini, J. Morini, D. Alloni, W. Friedland, P. Kundrát, E. Schmitt, M. Puchalska and L. Sihver. The origin of neutron biological effectiveness as a function of energy, Scientific Reports 6 (2016) 34033. [32] D.T. Goodhead and H. Nikjoo. Track structure analysis of ultrasoft X-rays compared to high-and low-LET radiations, International Journal of Radiation Biology 55(4) (1989) 513–529. [33] E. Schmid, D. Schlegel, S. Guldbakke, R.-P. Kapsch and D. Regulla. RBE of nearly monoenergetic neutrons at energies of 36 keV–14.6 MeV for induction of dicentrics in human lymphocytes, Radiation and Environmental Biophysics 42(2) (2003) 87–94. [34] R. Miller, C. Geard, D. Brenner, K. Komatsu, S. Marino and E. Hall. Neutron-Energy-Dependent Oncogenic Transformation of C3H 10% 1/2 Mouse Cells, Radiation Research 117(1) (1989) 114–127. [35] T.K. Pandita and C.R. Geard. Chromosome aberrations in human fibroblasts induced by monoenergetic neutrons. I. Relative biological effectiveness, RadiationResearch 145(6) (1996) 730–739.